A Way of Life

by David Kelley

I grew up in a family of five generations of Vermonters. When I was young, I hunted with my father. Later in life, I hunted with a bird dog. I have the deepest respect for those who hunt to feed themselves as opposed to those of us who depend on slaughterhouses, cattle cars and factory farms for our food. The hunters I know hunt with skill, care and respect for the lives they take to feed themselves. Often, the prey is deer from a herd that needs thinning. It will provide a family with venison for a winter.

I love to fish. I love fried eggs and grilled trout on a chilly mountain stream morning. I loved fishing on the New Haven and the Clyde rivers when I was young. Today, I love fishing the Madison in Montana and the Clearwater in Idaho even more.

I am now on the board of the Vermont Wildlife Coalition that has hunters and anglers among its members. Even our board of directors and advisory board includes hunters and anglers, several of whom are multi-generation Vermonters. The coalition has listed its positions clearly on its website for years and also included them in all testimony to the Legislature. Other wildlife groups have done the same. Despite this, the trapping lobby continues to engage in a disinformation campaign right out of an extremist’s playbook calling people like me, who are opposed to recreational trapping, “anti- hunting” and “anti-fishing.” That is sheer bullpuckey.

The vast majority of Vermonters — 68-75% based on surveys by the Fish & Wildlife Department and UVM’s Center for Rural Studies — want to restrict recreational wildlife trapping where, in Vermont, 9,000 animals a year, like bobcats, otters and foxes, can suffer in traps for an entire day or die horrible deaths in so-called “quick-kill” traps. And it is not only targeted animals who suffer. Ask the Vermont dog owner whose dog was killed in December if watching her dog die in her arms was quick. Taking your dog on a walk on a public trail should never end in such a tragedy. According to trapper-reported data, 13 dogs and cats were caught in traps in 2022. That number is likely much higher.

There is a reason trapper lingo includes “SSS” as a common acronym. It stands for “Shoot, Shovel and Shut-up,” which is likely what happens to many accidental catches, including owls, hawks, eagles, turtles, domestic pets and any other hungry animal unfortunate enough to catch the scent of a trap baited with meat. Each trapper can have unlimited traps out on the landscape, including next to public trails, and catch an unlimited number of animals. The coalition’s position is trapping should be done only when necessary to protect property, for public health and safety, or for conservation. It should not be done as a recreational pursuit.

What does recreational trapping have to do with fishing or hunting? Nothing. The trapping lobby is simply trying to drag respectable hunters and anglers into the muck with them.

They have even resorted to calling themselves social justice victims. That bull is just too ridiculous to address. Restrictions on a recreational pursuit are not a social injustice issue. That is insulting to those groups who have faced real injustice based on innate features, such as skin color. Allowing recreational trappers to mine and extract unlimited and valuable public resources while creating intense suffering that, were it done to any other animal would be felony abuse, is beyond privilege. It is something that needs to go the way of dogfighting and other “traditions” that have no place in a civilized society.

Dave Kelley lives in Greensboro and is the Vice Chair of the Vermont Wildlife Coalition.


Ours to Reason Why: Wildlife Governance and the Need for Change

by David Kelley

David Kelley is Vice Chair of the Vermont Wildlife Coalition

The article below was written in response to seeing an image of a bobcat that had been shot and killed for recreation.

When I was twelve years old I was allowed to go hunting alone. I had a Stevens single shot 410, but in one of my earliest forays in the woods I took my father’s 12 gauge shotgun. I remember almost every detail of one part of that day. It was a warm, sunny autumn day. Most of the leaves were off the trees. I saw a squirrel leap to a branch a few yards in front of me. Without thinking, I raised the gun and shot. The squirrel was so close the birdshot didn’t have time to spread. The squirrel was dead with just a big hole blown in the center of its body. There was no way it could be eaten, and I just left it.

Hemingway wrote “what is moral is what you feel good after, and what is immoral is what you feel bad after.” I don’t know if that is really the litmus test, but I remember to this day how I felt. Even as a twelve year old I could feel I had done something wrong. I have grown to have an abiding respect for those who hunt with skill and care. A hunter hasn’t paid someone else to kill his food for him. A hunter knows his quarry was born free, lived free, and was never subjected to the hideousness of factory farms, cattle cars or slaughter plants. When people share images of animals I wondered why that bobcat was killed.

In all of the years I have spent in the woods I have only seen one bobcat. It was toward the end of the day. I was in Glover with my father. He spotted it first and we were both thrilled to catch a glimpse of it. There is still to this day something awe inspiring about these animals and the struggle and strength it takes to survive in the wild, their unfettered freedom, and the harsh beauty and simplicity of their lives.

I practice law for a living. I have spent a good deal of my career thinking, and arguing, about the difference between right and wrong, legal and illegal, ethical and unethical. I think most grown ups understand that being legal isn’t necessarily right. Slavery was once legal. Beating children was once legal. Morality asks us to ask the fundamental question “why”?

Bobcats eat mice, moles and rodents. Those mice, moles and rodents spread ticks and lyme disease. Those ticks threaten our deer, moose, domestic pets and even humans. The bobcats and foxes that help control an increasingly dangerous tick population are doing us a great service while they are alive. I don’t know what good they do dead. Nobody I know eats fox or bobcat. New Hampshire hasn’t allowed bobcats to be hunted since 1989.

Our fish and wildlife are a public trust, but the rules of right and wrong regarding fish and wildlife are made by a small, lay person Board, chosen in a seemingly incestuous process where qualified applicants do not even receive an acknowledgment of their application, much less notice that they haven’t been chosen. The result of this process is a Board impervious to change or public interest. It refuses to end any abusive hunting practices including killing contests, no bag limits, or even 24/365 open seasons for some species. As human technology evolves some of that technology, such as smart rifles, drones, GPS systems, radio collars and live action trail cams makes it even more imperative that we begin a more open, transparent and public conversation about the rules and ethics around hunting and wildlife.

We live in a world where most of us hope and try to make things better. I think I can say with confidence that most Vermonters are opposed to unreasonable and unnecessary waste or cruelty toward wildlife. The vast majority want fact based, science-based governance of wildlife. If, in our governance of fish and wildlife we can’t ask that all-important question “why” more openly and more often, then hunters will eventually become the so-called “antis” – anti science, anti wildlife and anti public interest and Vermont’s hunting tradition will be forever diminished.

Long Trail Painting Expedition to Support VWC

Ring neck on Preston Pond in Vermont. Painting by Rob Mullen. 

Ring neck on Preston Pond in Vermont. Painting by Rob Mullen.

By Rob Mullen

I have done much of the Long Trail (LT) over the years, but not all of it. As a Vermonter and a semi-professional adventurer, not having done the whole LT feels wrong. Since the early 1980s, I have run about 30 expeditions (mostly by canoe) from Labrador to Alaska (and Arkansas, Texas/Mexico, Montana, and Kentucky). The last 20 of them, since 2001, have been art expeditions in support of a developing boreal forest exhibition. This year, we were headed for the “Barrenlands” of the Northwest Territories. The Coronavirus changed all of that.

Among the less tragic consequences of the Covid-19 pandemic has been the closing of the Canadian border to U.S. citizens. Wilderness plans were put on hold. And not only that, but like millions, I got hit with a major challenge to making a living. Being a self-employed artist (www.paintnpaddlestudio.com Signature member of the Society of Animal Artists), I did not have a job to ‘lose,’ but virtually all shows were cancelled, and galleries closed. Moreover, I have become somewhat addicted to yearly adventures. Then, reading something about ‘staycations’ brought the Long Trail out of the mist of my mind (it passes close to our house).

“End-to-End” of course (time to get it done!), and not just doing the LT, but doing it like my Canadian and Alaska art expeditions; as a painting trip. I will depart in the second week of September, allowing three weeks for hiking, one week for painting. Hopefully, this will help me adapt my work to the changing world we live in.

Along with any benefits to me, I also want to use the trek to raise the profile and funding for the Vermont Wildlife Coalition (VWC).

To that end, I am offering an opportunity to claim some artwork from the journey in exchange for sponsoring me on a mileage basis (LT is 273 miles) as follows:

  • $0.05 per mile - One hi-res (300 dpi) digital file of a painting from the trip suitable for printing. (This equals a $13.65 pledge IF I finish the entire 273 miles.)

  • $0.10 per mile - One hi-res file of a painting from the trip plus a satellite map link to my real-time position throughout the hike

  • $0.20 per mile - Two hi-res files of different paintings from the trip plus a satellite map link to my real-time position throughout the hike

  • $0.30 per mile - Three hi-res files of different paintings from the trip plus a satellite map link to my real-time position throughout the hike

  • $0.40 per mile - Four hi-res files of different paintings from the trip plus a satellite map link to my real-time position throughout the hike

  • $0.50 per mile - Five hi-res files of different paintings from the trip plus a satellite map link to my real-time position throughout the hike

  • $0.60 per mile - Five hi-res files of different paintings from the trip, a selection of ten photographs from throughout the hike, and satellite map link to my real-time position throughout the hike

  • $0.70 per mile - Five hi-res files of different paintings from the trip, fifteen select photographs from the hike, satellite map link to my real-time position throughout the hike

  • $0.80 per mile - Five hi-res files of different paintings from the trip, one original black and white (pencil or pen) from the hike, satellite map link to my real-time position throughout the hike

  • $0.90 per mile - Five hi-res files of different paintings from the trip, one original black and white (graphite or pen and ink) from the trip, ten select photos from the trip, satellite map link to my real-time position throughout the hike

  • $1.00 per mile - Five hi-res files of different paintings from the trip, one original painting from the trip, ten select photos from the trip, satellite map link to my real-time position throughout the hike

    Prints and photographs: 75% of proceeds go to the Vermont Wildlife Coalition and 25% to the Green Mountain Club. Originals: 15% of proceeds go to the Vermont Wildlife Coalition, 10% to the Green Mountain Club, and 75% to the artist.

    The Vermont Wildlife Coalition is a registered 501(c)4 charitable organization. Donations are not tax deductible.

    This campaign has ended. Thank you to all of our wonderful sponsors!!!